NEXT DATE OF MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY CASE IN SUPREME COURT IS FIXED ON 02/04/2015.
SLP NO. 21803/2014-
UNION OF INDIA & ORS Vs M V MOHANAN NAIR
REGISTRAR COURT ALLOWED 4 WEEKS TIME TO FILE COUNTER REPLY ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS. THE CASE IS POSTED TO 22ND APRIL 2015.
Posted on Fri, Feb 13th, 2015, in What's new. Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.
no
excellent article on waterproofing.
CPWD में पत्राचार से ली गयी इंजीनियरिंग डिग्री/ डिप्लोमा को वैध माना जा रहा है या नही? कोई बतायें प्
Thank you for sharing this information with us about precast environmental regulations. We uses the
Limited car parking space problem its a really big issue for every person. But now this problem is s
Nowadays Car parking space problem is a very big problem in India because, in any complexes, Busines
Respected Sir, I am retired MWO J Das of IAF requesting that 60 days before rooms can be booked by a
it is a good blog.
CPWD Engineers Association website
CPWD EA- Website
CPWD EA-Facebook Page
CPWD ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION-Blog 
My Appointment in LDC G.P.1900/ 15.11.84,Promoted UDC G.P.2400/ 20.3.91, Completed 24 years on 15.11.2008 should be allowed 4200/ on hierarchy from 15.11.2008 under old scheme of ACP, but I was allowed MACP G.p. 2800/ from 1.09.2008, while order of MACP was issued on 19.05.2009, If any order/ Decision of court is issued in this regard, requested to intimate.,
LikeLike
Pl send updates on MACP case in supreme court
LikeLike
Good
LikeLike
The Central Govt. Service rule/laws applied on each and every central Govt. employees in the same manner but in the case of Raj pal he is getting more benefit then the other lacs of central Govt. employees. How can it possible that one can get the benefit more then the other employees. The judgement of CAT in the case of Rajpal should be applied on the all central Govt. Employees. It is not justice with the other employees that they are getting less benefits then the Raj pal even they are all also central Govt. Employees. Now this is a duties of Hon’ble Courts who have passed orders in other cases to direct the concern ministry to implement the order of Hon’ble Courts and allow the benefits of promotional hierarchy to all other Central Govt. Employees.
Sanjay Kapoor
ASI, Agra
LikeLike
MACP which was introduced in 6th CPC to encecourage those deprived of promotion in service is being misinterpreted and hurdles created at every stage discouraging the staff and subjecting them to dissatisfaction. MACP is very simple to implement, it is surprising how how the implementing authorities are obstructing benifit provided to the promotion deprived employees. This stalls the performance of the govt organisations. Intervention of parliament is needed for proper implementation of MACP.
LikeLike
What is the present status?
LikeLike
MACP Sheme is erroneous, self contradictory and disadvantageous for those employees who do not get promotion for 10/20/30 years of service. Financial upgradations under MACP Scheme given under Para 28(iii) (B) , 28(B) only after seven years service and after five years service are contrary to it’s para-1 of Annexure of the MACP Scheme under which financial upgradation is to be granted on completion of 10 years service in the same grade pay. K.P.SINGH , Advocate & President, Central Govt. Library Association, Dehradun
LikeLike
MACP Scheme is erroneous, self contradictory and dis-advantagious. I have some points in this regards which may be useful in supreme court cases. The email address of engineers association is required so that I may send the points through email. kpsingh
LikeLike
judgement in case of Rajpal of CAT Chandigarh has been implemented therefore on discreamation should be don with others. kpsingh dehradun
LikeLike